KARUN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate.

(2.) THE applicant is seeking bail in case crime No. 20 of 2009, under sections 315, 506 IPC, police station Majhola, district Moradabad.

(3.) THE sheet anchor of the applicant's contention was that the information of the dead body was given on 26.12.2008 at 2.20 PM on the basis of which the inquest was conducted at 5 PM in which the informant himself was present. Whereas according to the FIR and statement of the witnesses the incident took place at 7.00 PM on 26.12.2008 and, therefore, the inquest which was conducted did not relate to the child at all, but to some other child, who was found strangulated under similar conditions. We are not at all impressed by this argument of the learned Counsel for the applicant.