LAL CHAND PRASAD Vs. DY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri M. N. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Faujdar Rai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

(2.) BY means of present petition, the petitioners are challenging the order dated 15.1.2005, passed by Deputy Director of Consolidation, Mirzapur by which the revisions filed by the petitioners have been rejected.

(3.) IT appears that against the order of the Settlement Officer Consolidation, Gokul Prasad and his heirs have not preferred any revision before the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Mrizapur and Revisions No. 65 and 64 were preferred by the petitioner Lal Chand alongwith other six persons. IT appears that Makhroo etc., filed the recalling Application No. 1175 and Anil Kumar filed recalling Application No. 1176 before the Settlement Officer Consolidation and one Sri Kanta claimed to be co-purchaser filed the Appeal No. 422 before the Settlement Officer Consolidation. The Settlement Officer Consolidation vide order dated 11.10.2004 rejected both the recalling applications and has also held that the appeal has been decided by the Settlement Officer Consolidation after hearing the learned counsel for the parties on merits. The Appeal No. 422 filed by Kanta has also been rejected as the issue has already been decided in the earlier appeal vide order dated 25.6.2003 after hearing learned counsel for the parties on merit and there is no reason to take a different view. The revisional authority vide impugned order dated 15.1.2005 rejected both the revisions.