SHREE PRAKASH MISHRA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) List has been revised. None appeared for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel and Sri Srikant Shukla, Advocate for the respondents are present. However, I have perused the record.

(2.) The petitioner has sought the following reliefs :

(3.) The entire claim of petitioner is that having worked for 240 days in a year he is entitled to be treated as regular in view of the law laid down by this Court in Jai Kishan v. U.P. Cooperative Bank Ltd., 1989(1) UPLBEC 144.