LAXMI MUSAHAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

(2.) IT has been contended by the learned Counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no independent witness of the alleged recovery. There are no criminal antecedents of the applicant. Applicant is in jail since 25.2.2009.