JAGAT NARAIN LAL Vs. RAM SAKAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE petitioner, who is said to be an adopted son of Late Baijnath Lal, claimed himself to be the sole tenure-holder of the entire land in dispute, which was rejected by all the three Consolidation Courts hence the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition for quashing of the orders passed by the Consolidation Courts.

(3.) COUNSEL for the petitioner contends that the right of the contesting opposite parties had already extinguished under Section 210 of the U.P.Z.A. And L.R. Act and the petitioner became Sirdar under Section 210 of the said Act. The claim of the opposite parties was barred by limitation under Section 209 of the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act. The Consolidation Authorities have wrongly declared them Sirdar of the land in dispute and allowed their claim, though time barred, by giving benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act.