HARI SHANKAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri V. S. Parmar, advocate appearing for the applicant, Sri Dinesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the complainant and A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

(2.) AN F.I.R. was lodged on 27.6.2007 by the complainant Chottey Lal alias Babloo at P. S. Khanna, District Hamirpur, where a case under Sections 363, 366, 376 and 506, I.P.C. and Section 3 (1) (xii) of S.C./S.T. Act was registered against Parasram, Pankaj, Dilip, Ram Kishore, Dhiru alias Dhiraj and Harishankar.

(3.) A.G.A. and learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application stating that prosecutrix has fully supported the case of the prosecution in her statement recorded under Section 164, Cr. P.C. and hence, in this heinous crime of gang rape, applicant should not be granted bail.