LAL SAHAN CHAUDHARY Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri K. K. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State of U. P. and Sri B. D. Misra and Sri R. S. Parihar, learned counsel for O. P. No. 2.

(2.) THIS application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to quash the proceedings of the Criminal Case No. 532 of 2001 under Sections 467, 468, 471, 419 and 420, I.P.C. pending in the court of learned IIIrd Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Deoria.

(3.) IN reply of the above contention, it is submitted by learned A.G.A. that in the present case the INvestigating Officer has submitted the charge-sheet after collecting the cogent evidence disclosing the commission of alleged offence. During investigation it has been revealed that the applicant has obtained the appointment on the basis of forged papers. The INvestigating Officer has not committed any error in submitting the charge-sheet and learned Magistrate has also not committed any error in taking the cognizance and submitting the charge-sheet against the applicant.