AJEET BAJPAI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri S.C. Shukla, learned Counsel for the appellant, learned State Counsel for the re spondents 1 and 2 and Sri Sakha Ram Tiwari, learned Counsel appearing for re spondent No. 3.

(2.) BY means of the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge, only a direction has been issued that case No. 302 of 2008 filed under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act and case No. 390 of 2008, filed under section 125, Cr. P.C. be decided within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is served on the opposite party.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the appellant, however, submitted that in such a short time, due opportunity of hearing would not be afforded to the appellant. It is a mere apprehension. If the parties and their Counsel co-operate, we see no reason why due opportunity of hearing will not be given to them.