RAISUL HASSAN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Raj Kumar Khanna, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Prem Chandra, learned Counsel for the opposite party No. 2.

(2.) THE case of the petitioner is that he was working as Store Keeper in the Health Department of Nagar Nigam, Moradabad from where he retired on 28.2.2005 after attaining the age of superannuation. Since that date he has not even been paid the provisional pension and he has been suffering economically and socially as well. THE petitioner has made several representations which did not bring any fruitful result and finally this writ petition has been filed before this Court.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the opposite party Sri Prem Chandra has fairly admitted that no pension has been paid to the petitioner but he hastened to add that there are reasons for the same which have been enumerated in the counter affidavit.