ANEES AHMAD Vs. RAMESH KUMAR PANDEY AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the appellant, Sri A.K. Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and the learned standing counsel.

(2.) THIS is an appeal against an order of the learned single judge dated 19.12.2008 by which he has issued notice to the respondents in the writ petition and has also passed an interim order. According to the appellant he is the senior most teacher in the intermediate college and claims a right to officiate as the principal. The respondent Ramesh Kumar Pandey in this appeal on the other hand has been selected by the U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board, Allahabad. It appears that the appellant filed a Writ Petition No. 59995 of 2008 challenging the selection of the respondent. In that writ petition, which is pending an interim order was passed that the joining of the selected candidate shall abide by final order to be passed in the writ petition. The said order was misinterpreted by the management by its letter dated 3.12.2008 to mean that Ramesh Kumar Pandey the selected candidate would not be permitted to join. Against this letter of the management the respondent in this appeal filed the present Writ Petition No. 66302 of 2008 in which the impugned interim order has been passed by the learned single judge. The learned single judge has interpreted the order passed in the earlier writ petition to mean that no stay order was granted in favour of the appellant and all that the court had directed was that joining of the selected candidate would be made subject to the final order to be passed in the writ petition. The learned single judge has directed that the District Inspector of Schools, Bareilly shall ensure that the respondent in this appeal shall be allowed to join as principal of the college within a week of the receipt of certified copy of the order failing which the District Inspector of Schools shall appoint an authorized controller in the college.

(3.) IT is clear from the aforesaid provisions that in the event the management has failed to appoint a selected teacher the Director may issue a direction to the management to appoint him as a teacher and to pay him salary from the date specified in the order. Sub-section 3 of Section 17 provides that the salary due to such teacher shall, on a certificate issued by the Director or the officer authorized by him, be recoverable by the Collector as arrears of land revenue from the property belonging to or vested in the society or body running the institution.