DHARMENDRA SINGH Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Shri K. Ajit, learned counsel for the appellants and the learned standing counsel for the respondents.

(2.) THESE intra court appeals arise from the judgment dated 22.12.2006 of the Hon'ble single Judge whereby Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 33147 of 2001 of the petitioners has been dismissed.

(3.) IT is said that there was suspicion of their indulgence in unfairmeans in General Hindi and General Knowledge papers. The learned counsel submitted that though show cause notice was issued to the petitioners by the District Magistrate but he himself had not seen any thing to infer that the petitioners are guilty of unfairmeans. He had mechanically followed the report of the private agency, which was authorized to conduct the examination. He also pointed out that there is an incoherence in the various documents of the respondents. In the counter-affidavit Annexure CA-2 shows that the petitioner-Dharmendra had attempted 49 questions in General Hindi and 46 questions in General Knowledge papers whereas Annexure CA-1 shows that the said petitioner had attempted 42 questions in General Hindi and 49 questions in General Knowledge papers. He further pointed out that two petitioners are alleged to have committed unfairmeans and inference has been drawn by comparing answer sheets of the two petitioners though it does not borne out from the record.