ANIL BALMIKI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) APPLICANT's counsel has filed supplementary-affidavit, which is taken on record.

(2.) HEARD Sri Raj Kamal Tripathi, advocate, appearing for the applicant, Sri J.R.S. Tomar, counsel for the complainant and A.G.A. for the State.

(3.) NEXT submission made by learned counsel is that there was no motive for the applicant to commit the murder of deceased.