CHANDRAWATI Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned Counsel for the revisionist and the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused record. None responded for the opposite party No. 2 despite notice.

(2.) THE revisionist Smt. Chandrawati has preferred this revision against the order dated 18.6.2008 rendered by the Sessions Judge, Barabanki in Criminal Revision No. 158 of 2008 whereby the learned Sessions Judge quashed the order dated 14.8.2007, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 12, Barabanki, consequently the revisionist's application under Section 156(3), Code of Criminal Procedure stood rejected.

(3.) THE learned Sessions Judge further held that the learned Magistrate had not applied his mind at all and had not disclosed any reason while passing the order dated 14.8.2007. If it was so, the learned Sessions Judge should have directed the Magistrate concerned to reconsider the matter and pass appropriate order.