ISRAWATI Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WE have heard Sri I.P. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of op­posite parties No.1 to 4 and Sri R.N. Gupta, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party No.5.

(2.) BY means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following relief:

(3.) COUNSEL for the petitioner submits that after passing the order dated 4.10.2008, the opposite parties were not disturbing the peaceful possession of the petitioner but all of a sudden under the political pressure of District Coordina­tor of B.S.P., the opposite party Nos.2 to 5 trying to give the possession to the opposite parties No.2 to 22 with the intention to cut the trees and grab the land. Thereafter, the petitioner moved an application before the opposite party No.2 on 3.8.2009 but of no avail and as such, he preferred an application under Section 151 of CPC before learned Small Causes Court, Faizabad that the said patta holders are trying to cut the trees and construction new construction, on which, the trial Court has fixed the date, for disposal of the application for 22.8.2009.