JADUNATH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ALL the above Criminal Appeals have been instituted against the judgment and order dated 29.6.2007 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge Court No. 3 Farrukhabad in Sessions Trial No. 346 of 1999 State v. Sone lal and others under sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 302 IPC P.S. Kampil, District Farrukhabad. Prayer of bail has also been made in the above mentioned appeals on behalf of all the appellants, namely, Sone lal, Jadu Nath, Pappu, Udaiveer, Rahis, Sibban alias Sheo Nandan, Kalloo alias Lalaua, Sri Pal, Santosh, Rajendra, Rajveer, Raju, Mahesh, Libbi and Hari Nandan, hence, the prayer of bail is disposed of by common order.

(2.) WE have heard Sri V.P. Srivastava Senior Advocate, Sri U.C. Mishra, Sri S.K. Dube, Sri Pushpendra Singh Yadav, Sri Sanjai Kumar Tiwari, Sri A. Kumar and Sri V.P. Mishra learned Counsel for the appel lants, learned AGA for the State and Sri Prashant Saxena Advocate for the com plainant and have also perused the Trial Court record as well as other relevant documents.

(3.) WE have considered the facts and circumstances of the case as well as sub missions made by learned Counsel for the appellants, learned AGA for the State and Counsel for the complainant. Numerous points have been raised by learned Counsel for the appellants but it is not possible to give any finding on the points raised on behalf of the appellants and point raised by the learned Counsel for the appellants shall be considered at the time of the final dis posal of the appeal. But seeing the gravity of the offence we are of the opinion that all the appellants except Pappu and Sripal are not entitled for bail.