REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

RAMESH CHANDRA Appellant

V/S

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

TAJAMMUL HUSAIN V. AC O. JALALABAD [RELIED ON]
JIWAN SINGH V. STATE OF U.P. [DISTINGUISHED]
DEO NATH KEWAT V. D.D.C. [RELIED ON]
NEELAM CHAUDHARYV. STATE OF U.P. [RELIED ON]
JAGPAL SINGH V. D.D.C. [REFERRED TO]
TASNEEM BANO V. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
STATE OFBIHAR VS. KAMESHWAR SINGH:STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH:GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH:KAMESHWAR SINGH [REFERRED TO]
DEVI DAS GOPAL KRISHNAN VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH VS. U P PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [RELIED ON]
DAYAMATHI BAI VS. K M SHAFFI [REFERRED TO]
U P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS. KRISHNA BALA [REFERRED TO]
SHYAM SUNDER VS. SIYA RAM [RELIED ON]
SAZIDS VS. COMMISSIONER OF CONSOLIDATION [RELIED ON]
USMAN GANI VS. STATE OF U P [DISTINGUISHED]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN all the above writ petitions, a common question of law is involved. IN these writ petitions, quashing of notification issued under Section 6 of the U.P.C.H. Act has been sought for. The writ petition (PIL) No. 47304 of 2005 is the leading case. The arguments were heard in the said writ petition.

(2.) THE writ petition-No. 10070 of 2006 is with respect to the notification issued under Section 6 of the Act relating to villages Bachgaon, Bhidarwa, Julendhi and Sakha, Pargana, Tehsil and District Mathura dated 21.7.2005.

(3.) IN all these petitions common question of law as to whether a writ can be issued quashing the notifications issued under Sections 4 or 6 of the Act, is involved.

Click here to view full judgment.

RAMESH CHANDRA Vs. STATE OF U P

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address