SITA RAM YADAV Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ACCORDING to Sri Krishna Ji Khare, learned Counsel for the petitioner, the real prayer of the petitioner is to quash the communication made by the Joint Secretary and Joint Legal Remembrancer, Government of Uttar Pradesh to the District Magistrate, Ghazipur informing him that he has been directed to communicate that in regard to his recommendation made under Clause 7. 08 of the Legal Remembrancer's Manual it has been decided after thorough think ing that the services of Sri Sita Ram Yadav (the petitioner) as Assistant District Government Counsel (Civil) will not be extended and, thus, Sri Yadav be relieved immediately (as contained in Annexure-5 to this writ petition ).

(2.) SRI Khare, with reference to the decision of the Apex Court in Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi v. State of U. P and others, (1990) 2 UPLBEC1174, contended that the order impugned is arbitrary inas much as the recommendations made by the District Magistrate and the District Judge concerned were based on perfor mance of the petitioners which were bind ing on the State.

(3.) THE Office is directed to hand over a copy of this order within (vie) to Sri Sudhir Jaiswal, learned Standing Counsel, for its communication to the Government. Petition dismissed. .