HEMANT KUMAR TANEJA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) O. P. Garg, J. Heard Sri S. F. A. Naqvi learned Counsel for the applicant. Sri Sanjay Bhasin for the complainant and learned A. G. A.

(2.) THIS is second bail application of the applicant who is indicated of the of fence punishable under Sections 498-A/304-B, IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant is arrained of the offence of committing murder of his second wife. A theory of suicide having been committed by the deceased was set up, which was found to be false. The first bail application of the applicant was re jected on 26-6-98 by me. The ground taken in the instant second bail application is that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted.

(3.) THE case against the applicant has been committed. THE trial Court shall conclude session trial against the applicant preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him. In the meantime till the trial is concluded the Applicant shall not leave jurisdiction of the Court of Sessions Judge, Bhadohi without obtaining prior permission of the trial Judge. He shall positively make him self available on every date, which may be fixed in his case by the trial Judge. In case of default on any occasion, it will be open to the trial Judge to issue non-bailable warrant against the applicant for his ar rest. Bail granted. .