RAM MURTI Vs. D D C SULTANPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) DEV Kant Trivedi, J. Heard the learned Counsel of the parties in this writ petition filed by Ram Murti against the order dated 24-9-1997 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation (Ad ministration), Sultanpur whereby the revision filed by Ram Murti was dismissed. The petitioner claims that this order is illegal and, therefore, should be quashed.

(2.) THE effect of the order passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation is that the petitioner has been allotted a chak on his original holding while the opposite party No. 3 Prahlad has been allotted chak on his original holding, partier, the Settle ment Officer Consolidation had also passed the similar order which has been affirmed in the revision.

(3.) IT has lastly been urged on behalf of the petitioner that he had installed a tube-well on the chak newly allotted to him. For this act of haste, petitioner himself is to be blamed. Merely because he had been suc cessful in getting a chak on the original holding of the opposite party No. 3 and even though the matter was reagitated by the opposite party No. 3 if he installed a tube-well, he could not get any relief in the writ jurisdiction.