(1.) D. K. Seth, J. By an order dated 17-4-1998 the writ petition was dismissed on merit. The said order has been sought to be recalled by the present application for recalling the said order dated 17-4-1998.
(2.) MR. VK. Burman, learned Counsel for the petitioner has based his claim on the ground that though the name of Shri R. K. Shukla, learned Counsel for the petitioner was printed in the list of 17-4-1998 but the name of MR. VK. Burman was not shown in the list and therefore, he could not appear when the matter was called on. MR. Shukla also did not appear. Therefore, in such circumstances, the revisional application could have been dis missed in default but it could not have been decided on merit. In support of his such proposition he relies on the provisions contained in Order XLI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter called as the Code ).
(3.) MR. Vishnu Gupta, learned Coun sel for respondents on the other hand op poses the contention of MR. Burman on the ground that the order Order XLI, Rule 17 of the Code has no manner of applica tion in a writ proceedings by reason of Section 141 of the Code. He next contends that Shri R. C. Shukla has not been dis charged from the case. There is nothing on record to show that Shri R. C. Shukla has ever been discharged. In case the name of one set of Counsel is printed, there is no justification for adjournment of a case on 'the ground of non-printing the name of other Counsel or on account of adjourn ment due to reason personal to him.
ABOUT US "REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD." is a Company incorporated in 1991 under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. Since its inception to 1995, the Company was busy in carrying out the activities related to various Banks' Job Work..
Read More
Sales: sales@the-laws.com
Support: info@the-laws.com
8000853936
9376168072
27, 4TH FLOOR, Agrawal Center, Ashram Road, Income Tax, Ahmadabad 380014.
LOGIN