SHITLA PRASAD NAGENDRA Vs. GORAKHPUR UNIVERSITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) D. S. Sinha, J. Heard Dr. R. G. Padia, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner, Sri Dilip Gupta, learned Counsel representing the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Sri S. G. Hasnain, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel ap pearing for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

(2.) THE grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been paid his pension for the period between 1st July, 1990 and 30th September, 1997. He also complains that the other retiral benefits, such as provi dent fund, have not been paid.

(3.) THE Court is not adjudicating upon the question whether penal rent for the alleged unauthorised occupation of the house is realisable from the petitioner or not? What concerns the Court is whether the pension and other retiral benefits pay able to the petitioner can be withheld on account of the alleged dues towards penal rent for the alleged unauthorised occupa tion of the house.