RAMESHJI PATHAK Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) R. H. Zaidi, J. Heard learned Coun sel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and also perused the record.

(2.) BY means of this petition the petitioner, who was holding the post of lekhpal, challenged the validity of the order dated 28-9-98, whereby the petitioner has been suspended from the post of lekhpal.

(3.) THIS petition is, therefore, dis posed of finally with the direction that the competent authority shall look into the matter and shall supply the documents on which charges are based and which are necessary for preparation of defence of the petitioner within one month from the date a certified copy of this order is communi cated to the said authority. Petition disposed of. .