(1.) FOLLOWING three prayers have been made in this writ peti tion: " (i) issue a writ or prohibition restraining the respondent No. 7 from holding or proceed ing with any investigation of Crime No. 485-A of 1994,p. S. Kotwali, Fatehpur; (ii) issue a writ of mandamus, command ing the respondent No. 7 not to investigate the case of the Crime No. 485-A of 1994, P. S. Kot-wali, Fatehpur and to return the papers to the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fateh pur; (iii) issue a writ of mandamus or direction in the said nature commanding the Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi to inves tigate into the case of Crime No. 485-A of 1994, P. S. Kotwali, Fatehpur. "
(2.) THE main thrust of the submission of Sri S. C. Tyagi, learned Counsel appear ing on behalf of the petitioner is that as allegations were made against the Super intendent of Police, District Magistrate and the Additional District Magistrate, Fatehpur and accordingly the investiga tion by the Additional Superintendent of Police, Fatehpur, respondent No. 7, was wholly uncalled for.
(3.) WITH these observations this writ petition is dismissed.