ASHOK KUMAR Vs. DISTRICT JUDGE KANPUR NAGAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SUDHIR Narain, J. This writ peti tion is directed against the order dated 24-8-1998 rejecting the application of the petitioner filed under Section 16 (5) of UP. Act No. 13 of 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and the order dated 15-9-1998 dismissing the revision against the aforesaid order.

(2.) THE landlord-respondent No. 3 filed an application for release of the dis puted accommodation on the ground that one Mohan Lal Verma was a tenant of the disputed premises. He having vacated the same, the accommodation should be treated as vacated. He also applied for release of the accommodation. THE Rent Control Inspector submitted a report on 15-1-1994 indicating that there was vacan cy. THE Rent Control and Eviction Officer declared the disputed premises as vacant on 27-7-1995. THE accommodation in question was released in favour of respon dent No. 3 on 3-4-19% by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer.

(3.) IN view of the above, I do not find any manifest illegality in the impugned orders. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.