RANVEER SINGH Vs. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE AGRA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Aggrieved by an interlocutory order dated 16th March,1988, passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Agra (respondent No. 1) granting inspection of ballet papers and recount of votes on the application of respondent No 3 pending trial and decision of the arbitration petition the petitioner Ranvir Singh has Hied this writ petition. The petitioner has sought a writ of certiorari seeking quashing of the impugned order and a writ of mandamus directing the respondent No, 1 not to proceed with the inspection of ballot papers and recounting cf votes which had been fixed for 2nd April,1988.

(2.) While admitting the petition on 28-3-1988 a Division Bench of this Court passed the following interim order :

(3.) Shri Rajendra Singh (respondent 3) filed an arbitration petition under Section 70/71 of the Act read with Rules 229, 230 and 444-C of the Co-operative Societies Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred as "the Rules") challenging the election which had gone in favour of the petitioner. The arbitration petition was transferred for trial and decision by the District Magistrate, Agra to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Agra, the respondent 1 (hereinafter referred as "the Arbitrator"). The petitioner contested the arbitration petition and filed his written statement before the Arbitrator, After the oral evidence of Rajendra Singh, Udai Veer Singh and one Gulab Rai had been recorded, the Arbitrator issued summons to Election Officer for recording his statement fixing 15th Feb. 1988 as the date for that purpose. It appears, after the statement of Election Officer had been recorded, respondent 3 on the same day made an application before the Arbitrator for summoning the marked copy of the voter list and the sealed ballot papers in connection with the election in question and further prayed that the same may be inspected and recounting of votes may be done. The petitioner objected to the summoning of the election record and recounting of votes, by bis application dated 8-3-1988. The Arbitrator, however, allowed the application for inspection and recount, by his order dated 16-3-1988, directing that the recounting of the ballot papers shall be done on 2-4-1988. It is against this order, the present writ petition has been filed and as already stated, the operation of the said order was stayed by this Court by its order dated 28-3-1988.