VIRENDRA SWARUP GOYAL Vs. MALTI AGARWAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision has been filed by the defendants under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act against the judgment dated 13.7.1987 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge acting as Judge, Small Cause Court.

(2.) BRIEFLY facts for the purposes of deciding the present revision are that admittedly the defendants are tenants of the premises in dispute which is a shop. The plaintiff terminated the tenancy under Section 106 of the T.P. Act and also served a notice of demand for the arrears of rent. As the accommodation was neither vacated nor the arrears of rent paid, the suit giving rise to this revision was filed.

(3.) THE defendant's case on the other hand was that the building was an old one to which the provisions of the Act applied.