CHANDRA PRAKASH GUPTA Vs. PUSHPA GUPTA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) V. P. Mathur, J. This revision was taken up for final hearing after the revision of the list. The opposite parties were represented by Mr. R. K. Srivastava, Mr. P. P. Srivastava and Mr. A. Prakash Advocates, Illness slips have been sent on behalf of Mr. R. K Srivastava, and Mr. A. Prakash, Mr, P. P. Srivastava, is also absent.

(2.) I have gone through the judgment of the learned IVth Addl. Distt. and Sessions Judge, Bareilly and also the judgment of the learned Munsif Magistrate Haweli, Bareilly.

(3.) SO far as Section 50 of the Evidence Act is concerned, it has no application to the facts of the present case. The Statement of the husband is not the statement of a person who as a member of the family or otherwise has special means of knowledge.