RAJO DEVI Vs. MUNSIF EAST

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -

(2.) BRIEF facts giving rise to this writ petition are that the petitioners allegedly took loan from opposite party no. 3 Shiv Shankar Tiwari on 5-7-1971, but according to the plaintiff-opposite party the petitioners did not pay up the loan hence the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 476/- was filed before Nyaya Panchayat, Sonvarsa, Pargana Doaba, district Ballia. Copy of the plaint is Annexure ' 1 ' attached with the writ petition. The claim of the plaintiff-opposite party no. 3 in the present writ petition was contested by the defendants-petitioners with the allegations that the suit was filed with false allegations and that the petitioners had executed a pronote in favour of the plaintiff's father and no loan was taken from the plaintiff with a view to exercise undue pressure upon the petitioners and to harass the petitioners the suit was filed against them (see Annexure ' 2 ' attached with the writ petition).

(3.) NO one appears on behalf of the contesting opposite party.