RAVI SHANKER Vs. RAVEL SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) V. P. Mathur, J. This revision was taken up for hearing after the revision of the list and learned counsel for the opposite- party Ravel Singh only appears. There is no one on behalf of the revisionist.

(2.) I have perused the two judgments of the Courts below and the record of the original case, which has been summoned.

(3.) AN appeal was preferred, being Criminal Appeal No. 306 of 1984 and came up for hearing before Sri G. A Farooqui, the then III Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur. The learned Sessions Judge assessed the evidence that was brought on the record and heard learned counsel on both the sides and came to the conclu sion that the Magistrate's finding of fact was justified on the evidence on record and did not call for any interference by him. Therefore, he confirmed the order of conviction both under Sections 448 and 506, IPC but directed that instead of undergoing the sentence of imprisonment outright, the accused should be let off on his executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 2000 and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount, to be of good behaviour and keep peace for a period of two years under the supervision of the Probation Officer appointed by the State Government. He also directed that he should appear to receive the sentence whenever called upon by the court during this period. Against this order the present revision has been filed.