PRABHU DAYAL Vs. SATISH CHAND KHANDELWAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY these applications for revision the applicants have prayed that the charge framed against them by the learned Magistrate under Sec. 406/34 IPC may be quashed.

(2.) THE circumstances giving rise to these revisions are briefly as follows.

(3.) FEELING aggrieved by this framing of charge the applicants preferred two revisions before the Sessions Judge. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, however, dismissed those applications for revision. Thereupon, these two applications for revision were filed in this Court.