(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Samidha, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and Shri Shailendra Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
(2.) In view of the order proposed to be passed, we do not deem it necessary to issue notice to respondent Nos. 5 to 7, as their interest would be well protected in the direction issued by us.
(3.) According to the petitioner, there is a dispute between the shares of the petitioner along with respondent Nos. 5 to 7, who are his own brothers. It is also the case of the petitioner that a Civil Suit relating to partition is also pending before the Competent Civil Court.