SAHABUDDIN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Chandan Agarwal, who has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no. 3 and learned Standing Counsel appears for respondents no. 1 and 2.

(2.) It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that she did not receive the copy of the provisional assessment notice and it was came to her knowledge only after the recovery certificate was issued and, as such, she could not submit her reply and in absence whereof, the respondent treated it to be final and issued recovery certificate.

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited our attention to the contents of the notice dated 22.9.2017 as well as the provisions contained under Clause 6.8(b)(1) of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005. The argument is that the respondent-corporation while issuing the provisional assessment notice was required to fix a date in the notice itself for hearing so that the consumer could appear before the authority concerned on the date so specified.