KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITI Vs. KANAHAIYA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Shiv Sagar Singh, learned counsel for the Cross Objectors-claimants/respondents and Sri Mahesh Chandra Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri S.C. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the appellants On Delay Condonation Applications, Civil Misc. Applications,Cross Objections and appeals.

(2.) In all these appeals cross objections alongwith delay condonation applications and the Misc. Applications have been filed by the claimants-respondents. Facts and grounds for delay condonation in all the objections are similar. Under the circumstances, the delay condonation application filed alongwith cross objection in leading First Appeal No. 659 of 2014 is reproduced below:

(3.) Perusal of the Delay Condonation Application as aforequoted, clearly shows that the Cross Objectors have not offered any explanation for delay for the period subsequent to 5.1.2014 till 24.2.2016. Thus, the long delay of 2 years and 73 days in filing all the cross objections filed in aforenoted First Appeals are wholly unexplained . Under the circumstances, all the Delay Condonation applications for condonation of delay in filing cross objections in the aforenoted First Appeals are hereby rejected. Consequently, all the Civil Misc. Applications and Cross Objections in all the aforenoted First Appeals also stand rejected.