REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Survir @ Tenta @ Govind Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U.P. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

U.P. VS. ANIL SINGH [REFERRED TO]
ALLARAKHA K. MANSURI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
YOGESH SINGH VS. MAHABEER SINGH AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
BHARWADA BHOGINBHAI HIRJIBHAI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. KRISHNAPPA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR VS. VINAY NANDA [REFERRED TO]
SUCHA SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
DASTAGIR SAB VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
PRITHVI MINOR VS. MAM RAJ [REFERRED TO]
DHANAJ SINGH ALIAS SHERA VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. SHREE KANT SHEKARI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. SANTOSH KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
C MUNIAPPAN VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]
SAMBHU DAS ALIAS BIJOY DAS VS. STATE OF ASSAM [REFERRED TO]
ALAMELU VS. STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE [REFERRED TO]
MUKESH VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [REFERRED TO]
SATISH KUMAR JAYANTI LAL DABGAR VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
MD ALI @ GUDDU VS. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Mahesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel (Amicus-Curiae) for the appellant-accused, learned AGA and perused the material placed on record.

(2.) In the present judgment, I do not propose to mention the name of the victim girl in view of the provisions of Section 228A I.P.C. and in pursuance of the observations made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in para-4 in the case of State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Shree Kant Shekari (AIR 2004 SC 4404) the prosecutrix (hereinafter referred to as 'victim').

(3.) Prosecution case, in brief, is that informant Jagdish son of Late Sri Buddhiram, resident of Village Saunkh, P.S. Magorra, District Mathura submitted a written Tahrir (Ext. Ka-1) before the police station concerned, narrating therein that accused-Survir @ Tenta @ Govind, his brother Shripal, sons of Soran Singh, resident of Summergarhi, Etah had enticed away his daughter (victim) aged about 12 years from Kumher Adda, Saunkh. Brother-in-law of accused-persons, namely Malkhan was also with them who is resident of village Kalai, District Aligarh. Occurrence had taken place on 22.08.2012 at about 4.00 P.M. Information regarding incident was given to Police Chauki Saunkh immediately and complainant was searching the victim at his own level also but victim has not been traced out. Hence, it is requested that his report should be lodged and the victim should be recovered.

Click here to view full judgment.

SURVIR @ TENTA @ GOVIND Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address