SAVITRI DEVI Vs. MANSA RAM

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS criminal revision, pre ferred by the revisionist under Section 397/401 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr. P. C.) r/w Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, is directed against the judgment and order dated 21-8-1996 passed by Judge, Family Court, Pauri Garhwal in Criminal Case No. 9 of 1996, whereby the learned Family Judge has rejected the application moved by revisionist u/s. . 125 of Cr. P. C. for maintenance allowance.

(2.) I have heard Sri U. P. S. Negi, learned, counsel for the revisionists and Sri Lokendra Dobhal, learned counsel for Respondent No. 1 and perused the entire material available on record.

(3.) THE learned Judge, Family Court, Pauri Garhwal vide his judgment and order dated 21-8-1996 after considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, rejected the appli cation moved by revisionist No. 1 moved u/s. 125 Cr. P. C. Feeling aggrieved by the said judgment and order dated 21-8-1996, the present revision has been preferred.