JITENDRA ALIAS BABLOO Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SHIV Shanker, J. Heard Sri S. K. Tyagi, learned Counsel for the applicant, Sri Ramesh Singha, learned Counsel for the complainant, learned A. G. A and perused the record.

(2.) LEARNED Counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is not named in the FIR. The kidnapee Kumar Annant, aged about 3 years was found in a lonely place on the road side on 17. 11. 2006 at 10. 15 A. M. towards the Kakore. Therefore, kid napee was not recovered from the posses sion of the present applicant.

(3.) IT is further contended that the statement of Lalit Kumar was recorded on 17. 11. 2006 in respect of Supurdagi of the kidnapee wherein nothing was stated to give the ransom to the miscreant. On the same day again his statement was recorded wherein the story of ransom has been de veloped.