ASHOK KUMAR Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) KRISHNA Murari, J. Heard Shri Manish Kumar Nigam for the petitioners, Shri P. K. Chaurasiya for respondent Nos. 5 and 6 and learned Standing Counsel.

(2.) UNDISPUTED facts relevant for the purpose of this case are as under.

(3.) IT has been urged by learned Counsel for the petitioners that Revision No. 23 of 2007-08 was filed challenging the notice dated 5. 11. 2007 mainly on the ground that without deciding the represen tation of the petitioners as directed by this Court, the two ponds in dispute were wrongly being included in the said notice and since by the time, revision was taken up for hearing fresh settlement had already been made, the revision had virtually be come infructuous but Revision No. 23 of 2007-08 could not have been dismissed for the same reason. IT has further been submit ted that the Board of Revenue has wrongly and illegally dismissed the Revision No. 73 of 2007-08 without recording any reason and without adverting to the ground raised therein challenging the settlement of rights in favour of respondent Nos. 5 and 6.