RAJAN LAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ASHOK Bhushan, J. Heard Sri ASHOK Khare, learned Senior Advo cate for the petitioner, Dr. H. N. Tripathi, learned Counsel appearing for the respon dent No. 6 and learned Standing Counsel.

(2.) BY this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 8. 9. 2007 passed by District inspector of Schools directing the Committee of Management to pass resolution for the appointment on the post of officiating Principal of a permanent Lecturer. The another order challenged is order dated 6. 10. 2007 passed by District Inspector of Schools by which Committee of Man agement was directed to give charge to Suresh Kumar, Lecturer (English) and submit necessary papers for attestation of signature of Suresh Kumar.

(3.) DR. H. N. Tripathi, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent No. 6 refut ing the submissions of learned Counsel for the petitioner, contended that peti tioner being only an ad hoc Lecturer, cannot be treated to be senior to the respon dent No. 6, who is substantively appointed as Lecturer in the Institution on 20th May, 2004. It is claimed that the respondent No. 6 had experience of 12 years in teaching the class of IX and X in Gulkandi Ram Ram Singh Inter College, Nauni, Agra, and he fulfilled the qualification as prescribed in Appendix A Chapter 2 Regulation 1 of U. P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921.