RALLIS INDIA LIMITED Vs. GOPAL JI SHUKLA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PANKAJ Mithal, J. Office has reported that there is a defect in the appeal as the valuation clause has not been worded in accordance with Chapter IX Rule VII (h) of the Rules of the Court.

(2.) LEARNED Counsel for the appellants prays for and is permitted to correct the wordings of the valuation clause. Accordingly, as there is no other defect in the presentation of the appeal, office is directed to allot a regular number to this appeal by treating the defect as having cured.

(3.) THE suit after contest was decreed by the Court of first instance vide judgment and order dated 29. 3. 2004. THE appeal of the defendants has been dismissed by the lower appellate Court vide judgment and order dated 29. 3. 2004, thus, the defendants have come up in the second appeal.