MAHARAJ SINGH Vs. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Consti tution of India, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 13-12-2005 (copy Annexure-7 to the writ petition), whereby respondent No. 3 directed respondent No. 5 Smt. Mamta to undergo one month's Training in the District Institute of Education and Training, Pauri Garhwal, as Shiksha Mitra in Primary School, Hatnoor.

(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the partes and perused the affidavit, coun ter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit filed by the parties.

(3.) RESPONDENT No. 5 Smt. Mamta Naithani filed her separate counter affi davit stating that her father-in- law Sambhu Prasad owns land and house in Village Manpur (Village Panchayat, Devi Sukhro) as well as in Village Vistana (Vil lage Panchayat, Hatnoor), as such, there is no illegality in her name being re corded in the family registers of both the villages. It is denied by her that she got manipulated her appointment as Shiksha Mitra. It is further stated by her that she is fully eligible to be appointed as Shiksha Mitra in Primary School, Hatnoor.