BASUDEV GARG Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN this criminal writ petition filed un der Article 226 of the Constitution of IN dia, the First INformation Report lodged on 13-05-2008 in Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar U/ss 406/ 420 I. PC. has been challenged and it is prayed that this F. I. R. and a proceedings emanating there from be quashed and set aside.

(2.) I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have perused the record of the case including the First In formation Report in question.

(3.) MR. Harish Pujari, the learned Ad ditional Government Advocate and MR. Rajeev Sharma, learned Advocate appear ing for respondent no. 4 have very fairly and frankly also conceded before me that, indeed, the First Information Report does not disclose or suggest the commission of any offence by anyone, much less by the petitioner and the First Information Report, if at all, discloses the existence of disputes of pure civil nature relating to and arising out of an agreement between the parties, namely, respondent no. 4 - M/s Paswara Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and KMG Interna tional Ltd.