SWAROOP KUMARI BAKSHI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) U. K. Dhaon and Bala Krishna Narayana, JJ. Heard SriAlok Singh,learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the opposite parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 14. 3. 2008 passed by the Nagar Mahapalika Tribunal, Lucknow by which the request of the petitioner to consolidate Misc. Case No. 4 of 2003 along with Misc. Case No. 6 of 1983 was refused.

(2.) THE learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that reference petition No. 6 of 1983 filed by the petitioner is against the award dated 31. 3. 1975 and reference petition No. 4 of 2003 preferred by Raj Kumar Bakshi is also against the award dated 31. 3. 1975 with respect to the same land. THE learned Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the reference under section 30/31 of the Land Acquisition Act is also pending before the Presiding Officer, Nagar Mahapalika Tribunal in which the question of apportionment of the amount of compensation is involved.

(3.) THE petitioner has alleged that Misc. Case No. 6 of 1983 filed by the petitioner is against the award dated 31. 3. 1975. THE reference petition filed by Sri Raj Kumar Bakshi under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, which has been registered as Misc. Case No. 4 of 2003 is also against the award dated 31. 3. 1975.