(1.) S. U. Khan, J. In this case, judgment was reserved on 18. 4. 2008 by following order: "list revised. No one appears on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant and learned Counsel for the respon dent Nos. 3 and 4. Judgment reserved. "
(2.) THIS is Plaintiffs appeal. The suit was filed for permanent prohibitory injunc tion seeking to restrain the defendants from interfering in the possession of the Plaintiff over the land in dispute. 2-A. Defendants respondents are as follows: 1. Town Area Committee, Baragaon 2. Bakshi town Area Committee
(3.) THE learned District Judge remanded the matter only on the ground that " property in dispute was not identifiable. Along with the plaint, map of the property in dispute had been annexed, which was only a rough sketch map giving no dimensions, only boundaries were mentioned.