RAM CHET Vs. GUMAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

(2.) IN the instant writ petition, the petitioners have assailed the order dated 30. 7. 1981 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, whereby the opposite parties 1 to 4 have been given co-tenancy rights and the petitioners were deprived of their half share over the land in dispute.

(3.) AS regardskhata No. 106, the name of Guman (opposite party No. 1), Ram Sunder and Punnu were recorded in the basic year. Subsequently, on an application moved by Jia Lal, co-tenancy right over the property was claimed. The same was recorded as no one has filed the objections.