SATYA PRAKASH Vs. UPPER COMMISSIONER II

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SUNIL Ambwani, J. Heard Shri Awadesh Pratap Singh learned counsel for the petitioner. Standing Counsel appears for the State respondents.

(2.) THIS writ petition arises out of proceedings under Section 33/39 of UP Land Revenue Act for correction of land records.

(3.) SHRI Gaya Prasad, claiming to be next friend of the petitioner, has filed this writ petition on his behalf. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the application for correction was made by some imposter. SHRI Satya Narain was recorded in the revenue record under the guardianship of his mother Satiniya, who died three years ago. It is contended that SHRI Satya Narain is still 'mad' and that SHRI Kushun Pal-respondent No. 3 (sister's son of SHRI Sundar-father of peti tioner) had made the application with some ulterior motive.