AMAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ASHOK Bhushan, J. Heard Sri Apruva Hajela, learned Counsel for the petitioner.

(2.) BY means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 10. 2. 2005, passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, deciding issue No. 2 in suit No. 20 of 2003-04 against the petitioner and the order dated 28. 8. 2006, by which revision filed against the said order was dismissed by the revisional Court as well. as the order dated 11. 1. 2008 by which the review application has been rejected by the revisional Court.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner further contends that both the Courts below have committed error in overruling the objection of the petitioner that suit is barred by Section 49 of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953.