VINOD PARASHAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) AMAR Saran, J. Heard learned Counsel for the1 applicants, Sri Vikas Tiwari, learned Counsel for the opposite party No. 2 and the learned A. GA.

(2.) LEARNED Counsel for the applicants has challenged the proceedings, which are to take place consequent to an application dated 8-1-2008 filed by opposite party No. 2 under Sections 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) district Jhansi.

(3.) IN this view of the matter, at this pre-cognizance stage, the application is not maintainable and it is rejected. .