RAMESH CHANDRA Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ASHOK Bhushan, J. Heard Sri Rajeev Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Onkar Singh learned Counsel appearing for the respon dent No. 4.

(2.) BY this petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 4th July, 2007 passed by Deputy Director of Consolidation allowing the revision filed by the respondent No. 4, Shiv Charan.

(3.) SRI Rajeev Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner, in support of the writ petition, submitted that the plot No. 741 has a tube-well and no area of plot No. 741 was allotted to the petitioner. Learned Counsel further submits that the finding of Depty Director of Consolidation that there is chak nali on two sides of chak of petitioner is incorrect. The petitioner has no source of irrigation since tube-well has been given to his brothers. Learned Counsel further submits that Settlement Officer Consolidation has rightly given chak naii while allowing the appeal which order has been illegally set aside by the Deputy Director of Consoli dation.