JAI KARAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Heard counsel for the petitioners and the standing counsel.

(2.) THE petitioner claims that he was appointed on substantive post of Naib Tehsildar having been selected through U. P. Public Service Commission following the procedure laid down in Subordinate Revenue Executive Service (Naib Tehsildar) Rules, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) and is entitled to work on the post of Additional Tehsildar on which he is functioning since his promotion on the said post.

(3.) ACCORDING to counsel for the petitioner, he has not been reverted till today ; that he is working on the post of Additional Tehsildar and is also being paid salary of the said post.