REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

DAYASHANKAR SINGH Appellant

V/S

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

NAZIR AHMAD V. KING-EMPEROR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. T GOPALAKRISHNAN MURTHI [REFERRED TO]
MANEKA GANDHI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
B K SRINTVASAN VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA UNION OF INDIA PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE AND INVEST MENT CO LIMITED STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS. MENT COMPANY LIMITED:PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE AND INVEST MENT COMPANY LIMITED:RESERVE BANK OF INDIA:PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE AND INVEST MENF COMPANY LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
I T C BHADRACHALAM PAPERBOARDS VS. MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER A P [REFERRED TO]
VIMAL KUMARI VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
ABRAHAM JACOB VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
ALPHONSE CAZILINGARAYAR AND OTHERS V. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
RAJINDER SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MUMBAI VS. ANJUM M H GHASWALA [REFERRED TO]
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT VS. GUJARAT KISHAN MAZDOOR PANCHAYAT [REFERRED TO]
CAPTAIN SUBE SINGH VS. LT GOVERNOR OF DELHI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF JHARKHAND VS. AMBAY CEMENT [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK LANKA VS. RISHI DIXIT [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. V RAMAKRISHNAN [REFERRED TO]
COMPETENT AUTHORITY VS. BARANGORE JUTE FACTORY [REFERRED TO]
KALAWATI SHUKLA VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
ANKUR YADAV VS. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioners are Class-l or Class-ll employees of U. P. State Warehousing Corporation or UP. State Agro Industrial Corporation and on attaining the age of superannuation, i. e. 58 years, have been directed to retire, where against they have filed the present writ petitions claiming that they are entitled to continue upto the age of 60 years. Since, common questions of law and facts are involved in all these matters, as requested and agreed by learned Counsel for the parties, these matters have been heard together finally at this stage under the Rules of the Court and are being decided by this common judg ment.

(2.) IN all these Petitions, the petitioners are employees of UP. State Ware housing Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'upswc') and have challenged the orders of authorities informing them about their retirement on attaining 58 years of age i. e. the age of superannuation.

Click here to view full judgment.

DAYASHANKAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address